Legal Opinion

Todd v. Silk Ass'n of America

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided June 15, 1917Published

Motion to punish defendant for contempt and to strike out its answer.

1Opinion of the CourtStrasbourger, J.

Plaintiff obtained an order for the examination before trial of defendant, a corporation, by its secretary. Its secretary failed to appear *404as directed by the order, whereupon plaintiff moved to punish the defendant for contempt and to strike out its answer pursuant to the provisions of sections 853 and 874 of the Code of Civil Procedure. On the return day of this motion it appeared that a copy of the papers had not been served on the defendant’s attorneys, though it became evident on the hearing that they were apprised of the existence of the order and accompanying -affidavits and were…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Hammond Packing Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Devlin v. . HinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Grant v. GreeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  5. Applegate v. CameronNew York Surrogate's Court · 1852

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API