Legal Opinion

Eisenberg v. Reininger

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 2, 1931No. 12,932Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mooee

Edna D. M. Reininger, defendant in error, was appointed administratrix of the estate of her husband, Morris Reininger, a druggist, who died May 30, 1930. By *512order of the Denver county court, she continued to operate deceased’s drug store business at 1894 South Pearl, the premises being rented from plaintiff in error, Mary Eisenberg, at a rental of $65 per month. Of the total amount, $715, so due for rent, the administratrix paid $371.50, leaving a balance of $343.50 which amount was allowed by the county court as an expense of administration and a statutory claim of the second class.

Upon…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  2. Deeble v. AlertonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  3. Grover v. CloverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
  4. Remington v. RemingtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  5. Hale v. BurfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API