Legal Opinion

People v. Eckhardt

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 13, 1984No. 2-83-0538PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Van Deusen

After a jury trial at which defendant raised the defense of insanity, she was convicted of the murder of her husband and subsequently sentenced to a term of 20 years’ imprisonment. The central issue in the case was whether the defendant was insane at the time she shot and killed her husband. The sanity issue was heatedly contested.

Defendant has raised a number of issues which were not properly preserved for review on appeal and which, after careful consideration, we do not find merit review under the plain error rule (87 Ill. 2d R. 615(a)). Defendant also claims error arising from a comment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. SzaboIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. CrossnoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  4. People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. WhiteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  2. People v. CobbAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  3. People v. FrisbyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. People v. HawkinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. People v. StackAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API