In Re Estate of Lovell
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
Reiber, CJ.
¶ 1. Defendants Charles and Hubert Lovell appeal a grant of summary judgment to plaintiff, Duane Amsden, in which the trial court found that Charles Lovell could not, pursuant to his powers as his father’s attorney-in-fact, transfer title of his father’s farm to himself and his brother, Hubert Lovell, where the power of attorney failed to explicitly grant the power to make such a gift. We affirm.
¶ 2. The facts of this case are not in dispute. On June 6, 1997, Phillip I. Lovell executed a will appointing his son, defendant Charles Lovell, and his stepson, plaintiff Duane Amsden, as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clayton v. UnsworthSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- Comings v. PowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- In Re Estate of KurrelmeyerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- In Re Estate of KurrelmeyerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- In Re Vermont Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1994
3Cited by2 opinions
- Krause v. Sunrise Family Resource CenterVermont Superior Court · 2019
- Radcliffe v. Sunrise Family Resource CenterVermont Superior Court · 2019