Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Lovell

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 10, 2011No. 2010-285PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reiber, CJ.

¶ 1. Defendants Charles and Hubert Lovell appeal a grant of summary judgment to plaintiff, Duane Amsden, in which the trial court found that Charles Lovell could not, pursuant to his powers as his father’s attorney-in-fact, transfer title of his father’s farm to himself and his brother, Hubert Lovell, where the power of attorney failed to explicitly grant the power to make such a gift. We affirm.

¶ 2. The facts of this case are not in dispute. On June 6, 1997, Phillip I. Lovell executed a will appointing his son, defendant Charles Lovell, and his stepson, plaintiff Duane Amsden, as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clayton v. UnsworthSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  2. Comings v. PowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  3. In Re Estate of KurrelmeyerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  4. In Re Estate of KurrelmeyerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  5. In Re Vermont Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Krause v. Sunrise Family Resource CenterVermont Superior Court · 2019
  2. Radcliffe v. Sunrise Family Resource CenterVermont Superior Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API