Legal Opinion

Farson v. Gilbert

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 22, 1904No. Gen. No. 11,110PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action of debt upon replevin bond. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. James S. Baume, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1903.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

' This case was before us at the October term, 1898. (Farson v. Gilbert, 85 Ill. App. 364.) It was an action of debt on a replevin bond, given by appellants to appellee, as sheriff, to indemnify him for taking from Donohue & Henneberry, ninety-one electro plates of pages of a certain atlas, published by Walton Thayer, who was the owner of the plates. The replevin suit was dismissed for want of prosecution. Donohue & ETenneberry, for whose use the suit was brought, claimed that Thayer, early in 1891, pledged the plates to them as security for the price of printing done, and to be done, by them…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Farson v. GilbertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
  2. Meeker v. Chicago Cast Steel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Parsons v. OvermireIllinois Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Columbia Casualty Co. v. SodiniSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  2. Richardson v. GilbertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907
  3. Mongoven v. WattsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API