Legal Opinion
Roberts v. Stiltner
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 25, 1918No. 14372PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Lewis county, Back, J., entered January 29, 1917, in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for specific performance, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
J. — The plaintiff, Roberts, seeks specific performance of the following contract in so far as it obligates the defendants Stiltner and wife to convey to him the S. W. % of section 21, in township 12, N. R. 5 E, in Lewis county, excepting ten acres described as the N. W. % of the N. W. % of the S. W. % of that section.
“Jan. 26,1916.
“We, the undersigned agree to sell the following described property, to-wit: S %, S. W. Vi, E % of N. *398W. 14 and S. W. 14 of N. W. 14 and lot 6 in section 24, T. 12, N. range 5 E. W. M. to J. W. Robert's for the following consideration, towit: $5000 (Five Thousand).
“…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Quarles v. QuarlesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
- Van Lehn v. MorseWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Don Yook v. Washington Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
- Flynn v. FlynnMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by10 opinions
- Schrock v. GillinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Kinne v. LampsonWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- Bookhout v. VuichWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- In Re Tveekrem's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Seattle-First National Bank v. PearsonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.