Gurary v. Light

—In an action to recover on promissory notes, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), entered January 7, 1997, which is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $334,000.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant’s contention that the court erred in permitting the plaintiff to make more than one motion for summary judgment is without merit. Noting the defendant’s claim that the parties had entered a further, oral agreement which operated as a novation of the promissory notes under which the *508plaintiff…