Legal Opinion

Town of Clinton v. Leake

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 7, 1905PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

March 7, 1905. The opinion of the Court was delivered by This appeal is from an order of the Circuit Judge refusing a motion to make the complaint more definite and certain, and to strike out an allegation of the complaint as to mental anguish. The complaint is founded on the alleged negligence of the defendant in failing to deliver the following telegram:

"Beaufort, S.C. 2-29, 1904. To C.W. Butler. No letter received. Send to Yemassee conductor in morning. W. E. Capers."

Obviously the telegram gave no intimation of what was to be sent to the conductor by the addressee, and in what respect it…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Primrose v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Simmons v. Western Union Tel. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
  3. Wallace v. ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1891
  4. Willis v. West. Union Tel. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  5. Lewis v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cronheim v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. ShenepSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  3. Shealy's, Inc. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1954
  4. Toale v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  5. Western Union Tel. Co. v. HankinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API