Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Bates
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided April 30, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Delehanty, S.
All objections of Mary H. Alexander having been withdrawn, there remain for disposition only the objections of Helen M. Bates. Her fourteenth objection is sustained. The proceedings in this court have consistently referred to objectant as Helen M. Bates, the name by which she was addressed by deceased. There is no warrant for the apparently gratuitous effort to apply some other designation to her. Her objections which deal genetically with the acts of the executors respecting the real property in the estate must be overruled. These objections are based on the legal theory that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Blood v. . KaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Crawford v. . McCarthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Farmers' Loan Trust Co. v. . KipNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Matter of Accounting of MasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- In Re the Accounting of Chemical Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Estate of WrightNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958
- Weil v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Weil v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949