Legal Opinion

State Capitol Bank of Oklahoma City v. Norick

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 20, 1976No. 49068PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIGHTMIRE, Judge.

A bank brings this action against two limited guarantors of a promissory note to recover an unpaid balance. The trial court granted defendants a summary judgment on the ground an amount in excess of their agreed liability limits had been paid on the note. Bank assails the ruling for being, it says, contrary to the guarantors’ agreement.

I

On August 10, 1967, Spring Creek Memorial Cemetery, Ltd. (SCMC, Ltd.), a limited partnership, gave plaintiff, State Capitol Bank, its $70,000, interest-bearing promissory note payable in monthly installments of $1,000 plus interest, beginning…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Walton v. Washington County Hospital Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  2. Cooper Grocery Co. v. StrangeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  3. Fidelity Savings Bank v. Wormhoudt Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  4. Dunlap v. StannardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  5. Walker v. McNealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bartmann v. Maverick Tube Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  2. Don L. Tullis & Associates, Inc. v. GoverMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. First National Bank & Trust Co. of El Reno v. StinchcombCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
  4. Bruce v. Landmark Central Bank & Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. 19 Collier bankr.cas.2d 940, Bankr. L. Rep. P 72,440 William R. Bartmann, Debtor-Appellant v. Maverick Tube Corporation and Nucorp Supply, Inc., Creditors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API