Legal Opinion

Michael T. v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 9, 2013No. AC 30046PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SHELDON, J.

The respondent, the commissioner of correction, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court granting, in part, the amended petition of the petitioner, Michael T., for a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that his trial counsel had rendered ineffective assistance by failing, inter alia, to present expert testimony to challenge the state’s presentation of incriminatory expert evidence on psychological issues relating *47to the child victim’s credibility.1 The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the failure of the petitioner’s trial counsel to present expert evidence on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Kenneth G. Pavel v. Melvin L. Hollins, Superintendent, Oneida Correctional Facility Eliot L. Spitzer, Attorney General of New York StateCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  3. Ben Gersten v. Daniel Senkowski, Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, Eliot L. Spitzer, Attorney General of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. Marrama v. Citizens BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  5. Artus v. GerstenSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Michael T. v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API