Legal Opinion

Hartshorne v. Ingels

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 12, 1909No. 5, Okla. TPublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Probate Courts Kay Countyj B. L. PLowsley, Judge. Action by H. A. Ingels against T, M. Hartshorne. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

Read the full summary

Error from Probate Courts Kay Countyj B. L. PLowsley, Judge. Action by H. A. Ingels against T, M. Hartshorne. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error. This is an action of replevin wherein H. A. Ingels, defendant in error, plaintiff below, seeks to recover from T. M. Hartshorne, plaintiff in error, defendant below, the possession of 1,000 bushels of corn, grown and produced by plaintiff on the northeast quarter of section 8, township 26 north, range 2 east, Indian Meredian, Kay county, during the .year 1906. The ease was tried to the court without a jury upon an agreed statement of…

1Opinion of the CourtHates, J.

(after stating the facts as above). It is conceded correctly we think by counsel for plaintiff that plaintiff’s rights are identical with the rights of his landlord, McKee. .McKee occupied the land prior to the time he was ousted therefrom by the writ of restitution under a claim that he had a right to homestead the same. He was therefore holding the land adversely to Hartshorne, the plaintiff in the ejectment suit and defendant in this action. Phillips v. Keysaw et al., 7 Okla. 674. 50 Pac. 695. The question, therefore, presented by this appeal is whether the crops cultivated and grown and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Page v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Hecht v. DettmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  3. Carlisle v. KillebrewSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  4. McCaslin v. State ex rel. AuditorIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Lindsay v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clark v. StrohbeenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  2. Anderson v. Marietta Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Cross v. RobinsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Dyer v. Royal Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  5. Hoblitt v. Farmers' State Bank of TuttleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API