Johnson & Johnson v. Chief Freight Lines Co., Joy Cartage Co. And Graves Truck Lines, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:
This appeal is from a final judgment entered in favor of a shipper, Johnson & Johnson, in an action brought under the Car-mack Amendment, 49 U.S.C. § 11707 (formerly codified at 49 U.S.C. § 20(11)), against three motor carriers — Chief Freight Lines Company, Joy Cartage Company, and Graves Truck Lines — to recover damages for the loss in transit of 990 cases from a shipment of baby shampoo, baby lotion, and baby powder. We affirm.
In a suit to recover damages for loss of goods in transit under the Carmack Amendment, the shipper establishes a prima facie case by proving…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Elmore & StahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- The Dublin Company v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hoskins v. Bekins Van LinesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Continental Grain Company v. Frank Seitzinger Storage, Inc. v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, A/K/A Burlington Northern RailwayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Man Roland, Inc. v. Kreitz Motor Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Allied Tube & Conduit Corporation v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- In Re Rolland, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.