Legal Opinion

State v. Williams, No. Jd Sn-2807 (Aug. 11, 1992)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided August 11, 1992No. JD SN-2807Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION CT Page 7535 The defendant maintains that as a result of the loss of 3 1/2 hours of tapes of testimony and legal argument he is entitled to a new trial under Conn. Gen. Stat. 52-268. That statute provides in relevant part: "[a]ny party who. . . has appealed a final judgment of the superior court, . . ., may move the court in writing for a new trial if. . ., . . .the stenographer or court reporter who took the testimony at the original trial therein if his stenographic notes are not…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Britt v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Draper v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Mayer v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API