Legal Opinion

Henson v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 13, 1960No. [App. No. 26, September Term, 1960.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

223 Md. 674 (1960)

164 A.2d 273

HENSON

v.

WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

[App. No. 26, September Term, 1960.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided October 13, 1960.

Before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.

2Per curiam

The application for leave to appeal is denied for the reasons set forth in detail in the order of Judge Harlan denying post conviction relief. With respect to the claim of the applicant that he was entitled to attend the post conviction hearing and to testify, we observe that he was represented at the hearing by counsel. His presence thereat was not required. Deal v.…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Evans v. Hot Shoppes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  2. Deal v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cheeseboro v. Warden of MaryLand PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  2. Wimbush v. Warden of the Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  3. Henson v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API