Legal Opinion
L-C Security Service Corp. v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided December 30, 1980No. Claim No. 64137PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Gerard M. Weisberg, J.
The question presented is whether all “condemnees” are necessary parties to a claim for the appropriation of real property, such that their interpleader is required. (Eminent Domain Procedure Law [EDPL] 103, 505.)
Claimant L-C Security Service Corp. was the mortgagee of real property acquired by the State. Claimant has moved to interplead L-C Equities (Equities), Jack Schwartz, Leslie Jonap and the Sidney Family Corporation (Family), the property’s reputed owners, praying that service upon Equities and Schwartz be made by certified mail at their last…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Schroeder v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Feinstein v. BergnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rohany v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1989
- City of Syracuse v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1983