Legal Opinion

State v. Henry

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1927No. 20389. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTorman, J.

Appellant was charged with two others of having committed the crime of rape. On the first trial, one of the defendants was discharged and the jury disagreed as to the remaining two. On the second trial, appellant was found guilty and his co-defendant found not guilty. From a judgment and sentence on the verdict of guilty, this appeal is prosecuted.

Two errors are presented: (1) that the court erred in unduly restricting the appellant’s cross-examination of a witness for the state; and (2) that the verdicts upon the last trial are so inconsistent that it was error not to set aside the verdict…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. GriffinWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. State v. EaidWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State v. BeatonWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Stossel v. Van De VanterWashington Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. State v. BurkettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1927
  4. State v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API