Legal Opinion

Voigt, Admr. v. Mergenthaler Linotype Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1938No. 26,995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFansler, J.

George H. Voigt some years ago sold a newspaper plant in Jeffersonville, Indiana, to appellant Hermann A. Wenige, upon a conditional sale contract. Thereafter Wenige purchased a linotype machine from appellee, and, for the purchase price, executed a series of promissory notes and a chattel mortgage upon the machine. Thereafter Wenige defaulted in his contract with Voigt, and Voigt brought an action against him in replevin and for damages, and recovered judgment returning the newspaper property to him, and for $4,500 damages. To satisfy the judgment, the property of Wenige, including the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Muncie National Bank v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Teutonia Loan & Building Co. v. TurrellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Chandler v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Farm Bureau Fin. Co., Inc. v. CarneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. STATE EX REL. HABERKORN v. DeKalb Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API