Legal Opinion

In re Sulk

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided August 4, 1908PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On application for payment of costs, &c.

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, V. C.

On April 21st, 1908, Josephine Sulk filed a verified petition in the above-stated matter praying that a commission in the nature of a writ de lunático inquirendo might issue out of this court to inquire into the alleged lunacy of her husband, Charles H. Sulk, and, on allegations in the petition, abundantly verified by affidavits, to the effect that Sulk was improvidently giving away and wasting his money and property, John S. McMaster, Esq., was appointed' receiver pendente lite, and a commission was issued to Frank P. McDermott, Esq., master in clianeerjq Dr. John C. Parson and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Whiteside v. PrendergastNew York Court of Chancery · 1847

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Penney v. Pritchard & McCallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  2. Seidler v. Branford Restaurant, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
  3. In Re GleasonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  4. In Re HarrisNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API