Legal Opinion

United States v. Daniel Edward Scott

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 30, 2008No. 08-10605Unpublished

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Daniel Edward Scott, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for resentencing, filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3559(c)(7). After review, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Criminal Trial and Appeal

In 1993, Scott was convicted of one count of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d), and one count of using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). The presentence investigation report (“PSI”) showed that Scott had 10 criminal history points, resulting in a criminal history category V. Three of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Castro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. United States v. Edison JordanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Wofford v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  5. Downs v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API