Legal Opinion
Azarow v. Sherneth Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 13, 1948PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HULBERT, District Judge.
Defendant moves for an order directing plaintiffs to furnish security for costs in the sum of $250.
The plaintiffs, both of whom are residents of the State of New Jersey, oppose the application upon the ground that this Court is without authority.
It is conceded that such authority formerly existed by Local Rule 53 of this Court which, however, counsel points out, was omitted from the present Rules of this District. And moreover, he contends that the Conformity Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 724,* has been abrogated by the new Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Craftsman Finance & Mortgage Co. v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1945
- Cavicchi v. Mohawk Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- In re Utility Consumers Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kreitzer v. Puerto Rico Cars, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1975