Legal Opinion

B. R. v. Merrick Garland

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 12, 2021No. 19-70386PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT B.R., No. 19-70386 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A200-822-829 MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted February 9, 2021 San Francisco, California Filed July 12, 2021 Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges, and Lee H. Rosenthal, * District Judge. Opinion by Judge Bea * The Honorable Lee H. Rosenthal, Chief United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation. 2 B.R.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Jamal Ali Farah v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Pereira v. SessionsSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  5. Lydia Garcia-Milian v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martha Chavez-Chilel v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
  2. B. R. v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API