Legal Opinion
Three Way Corp. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 3, 1986No. Nos. 84-1280, 84-1282PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BORK.
BORK, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners appeal the decision of the Interstate Commerce Commission approving without hearing the application of United Van Lines to amend the pooling agreement with its carrier agents. Petitioners, two affected carrier agents, argue that the amendments are anti-competitive and should not have received Commission approval under the Household Goods Transportation Act of 1980, 49 U.S.C. § 11342 (1982). We find, however, that the Commission properly denied a hearing because it correctly found that the proposed amendments are…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rothery Storage & Van Co. v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Citizens for Allegan County, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission, City of Allegan, Michigan, Consumers Power Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- National Classification Committee and National Motor Freight Traffic Association, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Rothery Storage & Van Co. v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1984
- Household Goods Carriers' Bureau v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1968