United States v. Jones
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GARLAND, Circuit Judge:
A jury convicted Duane Phillip Jones of gun and drug crimes. Jones contends that he is entitled to a new trial for two reasons. First, he argues that the district court erred in failing to suppress a statement he made at the time of his arrest. Second, he maintains that the government improperly disclosed inadmissible information to the jury. We find no error on either ground, and we therefore affirm Jones’ convictions.
I
The facts surrounding Jones’ arrest are not in dispute. The Superior Court of the District of Columbia issued a warrant for Jones on a charge of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Dean v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Watson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- United States v. Daniel RutherfordCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
- United States v. WillsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. FautzDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- United States v. RedrickDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.