Zakiya v. Reno
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BRINKEMA, District Judge.
Before the Court is petitioner’s Third Amended Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Habeas Corpus. Petitioner’s motion presents the novel question of whether, under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3624(e) (Supp.1999), the Bureau of Prisons may continue the incarceration of a person who has served his entire sentence but who has failed to sign paperwork regarding a payment schedule for his criminal fine.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
On February 18, 1994, following his federal convictions for tax evasion 1 and failure to file income tax returns, 2 petitioner Douglas W. Ross a/k/a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Zakiya v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003