Springall v. Fredericksburg Hospital & Clinic
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
NORVELL, Justice.
Subsequent to proceedings had in this Court with reference to an application for writ of mandamus, the trial court rendered judgment for appellee upon the verdict of the jury, and Mrs. Bessie Newton Springall and her husband, H. S. Springall, have appealed.
Our opinion in the mandamus proceedings contains a brief statement of the case, and it was stated that, “We are not here called upon to pass upon the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the' jury’s answers to any of the special issues, such questions are properly raised in a motion for a new trial.” See Fredericksburg…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Houston National Bank v. AdairTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- City of Dallas v. MaxwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Commercial Standard Insurance v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Mortensen v. MortensenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Jones v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Union Pump Co. v. AllbrittonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- City of Gladewater v. PikeTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Cook Consultants, Inc. v. Larson, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
- Peerenboom v. HSP Foods, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1995
- Rodriguez v. Moerbe, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.