Legal Opinion

In re Hinckel Brewing Co.

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided July 2, 1903PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Bankruptcy. This is an appeal from the order of the referee in bankruptcy reducing the claim of Isaac Hough against the estate, as allowed, from the sum of $1,768.64 to the sum of $569.36.

1Opinion of the Court

RAY, District Judge.

The Hinckel Brewing Company was engaged in the manufacture and sale of beer in the plant owned by said company at Albany, N. Y., and this was its principal business. To aid itself in disposing of its product, it advanced money from time to time to various saloon keepers, to pay license fees, etc., and, as a part of its business, and to aid in disposing of its product, on or about the 23d day of October, 1897, it entered into a contract with Isaac Hough by which said Hough let and rented to the said brewing company the premises at the corner of Washington Avenue and Capitol…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bray v. CobbDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1900
  2. In re JeffersonDistrict Court, D. Kentucky · 1899
  3. In re ArnsteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1899
  4. In re MahlerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1900

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Roth & AppelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
  2. Mendota Coal & Coke Co. v. Eastern Ry. & Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  3. Witthaus v. ZimmermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  4. In re AdamsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1904
  5. In re Globe LaundryDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API