Legal Opinion
Kaufman v. Magid
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 19, 1982No. Civ. A. 81-142-TPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TAURO, District Judge.
This action seeks the recovery of damages allegedly arising from mismanagement of and misrepresentations about securities investments made by the plaintiffs, David and Joan Kaufman. Named as defendants are: Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc. (“Merrill Lynch”); Thomas H. Magid (“Magid”), an agent of Merrill Lynch; William Hall (“Hall”), a Merrill Lynch account executive and vice president of the Jenkintown, Pennsylvania regional office of Merrill Lynch; and Arthur Toll (“Toll”), who allegedly acted as an investment advisor to the plaintiffs. Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- In Re Catanella and EF Hutton and Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Olson v. Potter (In Re Potter)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,111 Richard v. Cleary v. Perfectune, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Hagstrom v. BreutmanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- Nichols v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & SmithDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.