Legal Opinion

Lewis Lorenzo Sistrunk v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 26, 1993No. 92-3385PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.RApp.P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. Therefore, the ease is ordered submitted without oral argument.

In this pro se appeal, the appellant is challenging the district court’s denial of his motion for a free transcript. Following a jury trial, the appellant was found guilty of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 2113(a). This court affirmed the appellant’s conviction on appeal and the Supreme…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. MacCollomSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Floyd Woodrow Hines v. J. E. Baker, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  3. Theodore Ruark v. Frank Gunter, Gale A. Norton, Attorney General, of the State of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  4. Jerry C. Rush and Joseph W. Dougherty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. Russell Losing, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fadayiro v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  2. United States v. GroceDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1993
  3. People v. MannersColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. United States v. Donald AustinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API