Hart v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, Chief Judge.
We affirm Appellant’s conviction for corruption by threat under section 838.021, Florida Statutes (1997). Appellant argues that the information actually charged Appellant with harming the officer in question, rather than threatening to harm him, and because there was no evidence that Appellant physically harmed the officer, he should have been acquitted. Section 838.021 provides that an accused can be convicted of “corruption by threat” in one of two ways; either unlawfully harming a public servant or unlawfully threatening to harm a public servant. The information under…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ross v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Carver v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
3Cited by60 opinions
- Pena v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Geiser v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Welch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- ALI HASSAN ABDULLAH v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- ANGLES R. OWENS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.