Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hilton v. Haleyville Housing Authority

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 6, 1972No. 6 Div. 841Published

1Dissent

MADDOX, Justice (dissenting).

The majority has held that the issues raised by the declaratory judgment proceeding could have been litigated in the pending condemnation proceeding. I disagree. The complainant sought reformation of a written instrument, an established ground of equitable jurisdiction1 and .this issue could not be tried in the pending condemnation proceeding.

This lawsuit resulted because the parties disagreed on the amount to which the Hiltons were entitled. The Housing Authority claims that the agreement set the price of the land at $25,000 whether they decided to condemn the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Housing Authority v. Title Guarantee Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. AGM Drug Company of Alabama v. DobbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  3. Reynolds v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API