Legal Opinion

Rose v. Berryhill

District Court, C.D. California

Decided June 13, 2017No. Case No. SA CV 16-00173-DFMPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1082MEMORANDUM OPINION • AND ORDER

DOUGLAS F. McCORMICK, United States Magistrate Judge

Cheryl E. Rose (“Plaintiff’) appeals from the Social Security Commissioner’s final decision denying her application for Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits ..(“DIB”). For the reasons discussed, below, the Commissioner’s decision is reversed and this matter is remanded for an award of benefits,

I

BACKGROUND

On August 23, 2010, Plaintiff filed an application for DIB, alleging that she had been disabled since April 30, 2006. Administrative Record (“AR”) 81-82, 134-35. After her application was denied, she…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Treichler v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Carmickle v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Byrne v. SaulDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
  2. Kathryn Marie Morgan v. Nancy A. BerryhillDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
  3. McCormick v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
  4. Moon v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API