Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Ramon Ochoa

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 22, 2015No. 14-10124Published

1DissentNavarro, Chief District Judge

I respectfully dissent. The majority’s ruling upholds the draconian decision of the sentencing court to suddenly double the term of incarceration initially pronounced and impose the statutory maximum sentence based solely on a perception that the defendant was laughing at the court. Affirming this injudicious decree of the sentencing court defies the unambiguous language of Rule 35 of the Federal Criminal Rules of Procedure and the express limitation of 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c).

I

The jurisdiction of district courts to reconsider terms of imprisonment after they are imposed is expressly limited by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Bowman Dairy Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. United States v. John Allen Powers William Nichols, Contemnor/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. MezaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  5. Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API