Legal Opinion

Csx Transportation, Incorporated v. United Transportation Union Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 7, 1996No. 96-1172PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILKINSON, Chief Judge:

This case requires us to assess the propriety of a district court’s anti-strike injunction, which was issued to enforce an arbitration decision made pursuant to the Interstate Commerce Act (“ICA”). CSX Transportation sought to consolidate four separate railroads that it had acquired. The unions representing the railroads’ employees opposed the consolidation. After the arbitrator’s award in favor of CSX’s proposed consolidation was upheld by the Interstate Commerce Commission (“ICC”), the unions threatened a strike. CSX then obtained an injunction prohibiting that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. American Train Dispatchers' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Norfolk And Western Railway Company v. Brotherhood Of Railroad SignalmenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  2. Csx Transportation, Incorporated v. Transportation Communications International Union United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  3. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Transportation-Communications International UnionDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
  4. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Railroad SignalmenDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1998
  5. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Railroad SignalmenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API