Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. Hammond

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1934No. 21869. Rule discharged and cause dismissedPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farthing

The Chicago Bar Association, as relator, was given leave and filed an information against Henry W. Hammond, the respondent, on February 23, 1933. A rule was asked commanding Hammond to show cause why he should not be disbarred.

Hammond had been licensed to practice law in 1921. The information contained two charges: One that he overcharged Mrs. Hattie Glover for legal services and defrauded her of $600, and the other that he accepted $35 from Joseph Milas for costs required to be paid in filing a personal injury suit and converted this money to his own use. The respondent filed his answer to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. LottermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  2. People ex rel. Cline v. KerkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  3. People Ex Rel. Rock Island County Bar Ass'n v. McCaskrinIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  4. People Ex Rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. GrusdIllinois Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  2. In Re NovoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  3. In Re Disbarment of Robert J. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  4. Togneri v. BonaldiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  5. In re HansenIllinois Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API