Legal Opinion

Golden v. Riverside Apartments, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1986No. 85-666PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONALD D. COX, Judge Pro Tem.

Riverside Apartments, Inc. has appealed a judgment from Pineville City Court requiring a return of a $125 security deposit and a $150 pet fee posted by their tenants, Mr. and Mrs. Alan Golden. The judgment also ordered defendant to pay $200 in damages and $500 in attorney’s fees for willfully withholding the deposits without justification. We affirm as amended.

Appellant urges five grounds upon which the trial court erred:

*4791.) Awarding the return of a nonrefundable pet fee when not an issue before the Court;

2.) Finding the retention of part of the security deposit…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Makar v. StewartLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Calix v. WhitsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Moore v. Drexel Homes, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Cantelli v. TontiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Bradwell v. CarterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. BatchelorUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Calhoun v. CalhounSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Lambert v. ByronLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Smith v. BatchelorUtah Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API