Day v. Lupo Vine St., L.P.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtWillhite, Acting P.J.
*66Health and Safety Code 1 section 104113 requires every "health studio"-which is defined as "a facility permitting the use of its facilities and equipment or access to its facilities and equipment, to individuals or groups for physical exercise, body building, reducing, figure development, fitness training, or any other similar purpose, on a membership basis" ( § 104113, subd. (h) )-to acquire and maintain an automated external defibrillator (AED) on the premises. The question presented in this case is: Does a commercial landlord who leases space to an operator of a health studio owe a duty…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Day v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Sun'n Sand, Inc. v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Parsons v. Crown Disposal Co.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Delgado v. Trax Bar & GrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Estate of St. John v. SchaefflerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- Jabo v. YMCA of San Diego Co.California Court of Appeal · 2018
- Jabo v. Ymca of San Diego Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018