Legal Opinion
Kilbourn v. Brown
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 23, 1887PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Action upon a note executed by the defendants, who were husband and wife ; brought, by appeal from a justice of the peace, to the Court of Common Pleas of Litchfield County, and reserved on facts found and on a demurrer of the plaintiff to the answer of the defendant Sarah M. Brown, for the advice of this court. The case is fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
This is an action on the following note, the plaintiff suing as executor of the payee, and the makers being husband and wife:—
• “Mobbis, Oct. 18th, 1875.
“|50. On demand, for value received, we promise jointly to pay to Garry H. Miner the sum of fifty dollars, it being understood that the said sum is procured for the use and benefit of Sarah M. Brown, and for the payment of this claim when called for, she, the said Sarah M., pledges her own individual estate to the full amount of the sum stated in this obligation. , “ Shelton J. Bbown,
“ Sabah M. Bbown.”
The answer is that the note was signed by…
2Cited by1 opinion
- FreemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897