Legal Opinion
New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance v. Kowalski
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 14, 1995PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Marinelli, J.), entered April 26, 1994 in Columbia County, upon a decision of the court declaring that plaintiff was not obligated to provide excess insurance coverage to defendant Scott Kowalski.
In September 1990, defendant Scott Kowalski (hereinafter Scott) was driving a motor vehicle owned by his girlfriend, defendant Mary Beth Buckley, when he lost control of the vehicle, causing it to overturn and be struck by a second vehicle. The two other individuals who had been passengers in the car thereafter commenced negligence actions against Buckley,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hollander v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance v. KowalskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Kradjian v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. PanettaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by6 opinions
- Canfield v. Peerless InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Government Employees Insurance v. PaolicelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Fiore v. Excelsior InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Cotillis v. New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- In re the Arbitration between New York Casualty Ins. & EnzinnaNew York Supreme Court · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.