Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Martin

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1915No. 4195Published

Error to Prowers District Court. Hon. A. Watson Mc-Hendrie, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

The First National Bank of Granada, plaintiff in error and plaintiff below, hereinafter called plaintiff, instituted this action against A. P. Martin, defendant in error, and defendant below, hereinafter called defendant, to recover of him the sum of $1,555.22, with interest, the amount of two promissory notes, dated Dec. 12, 1911, signed by him, and payable 6 months after the date thereof to its order.

A defense of no consideration was interposed, and upon trial to the court with a jury, a verdict was returned in favor of defendant, and judgment was entered accordingly.

The answer, for a first…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Bank of Moore v. ForsythMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Bank v. Lowther-Kaufman Oil & Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Lilly v. Hamilton Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909
  4. First National Bank v. NorthupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API