Legal Opinion

Indiana State Prison & State Employees Appeals Commission v. Van Ulzen

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1991No. 73S04-9112-CV-986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

When the Indiana State Prison cancels instructional classes for inmates during an emergency lockdown, does the warden violate state law by temporarily assigning a teacher to non-educational duties such as answering the telephone, taking messages, and other tasks commonly performed by employees in lower job classifications? We conclude that the law permits such temporary assignments to different work at the same rate of pay. It is a decent alternative to laying off an employee without pay for the duration of the lockdown.

Facts

William Van Ulzen is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Blackwell v. CookDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1983
  5. Indiana State Prison & State Employees' Appeals Commission v. Van UlzenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peabody Coal Co. v. Indiana Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Indiana Department of Natural Resources v. Peabody Coal Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. LTV Steel Co. v. ZellerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API