Legal Opinion
Magistrelli v. Canuso
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 7, 1942No. 9 and 11 of 1941PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
GANEY, District Judge.
This matter arises in admiralty wherein two actions by Victor Magistrelli, trading as Wharton Construction Company, were brought against Francis A. Canuso, Sr., and Francis A. Canuso, Jr., co-partners, trading as Francis A. Canuso & Son. The one action No. 11 of 1941 is brought by the libellant for damages by way of rental and towing charges as well as for the loss of a scow allegedly due to the negligence in operation of the same by the respondents, and the second action to No. 9 of 1941 is by the same libellant against the same respondents covering rental and towing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. SheaSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Ira S. Bushey & Sons, Inc. v. W. E. Hedger & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Tomkins Cove Stone Co. v. Bleakley Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930
- Schwartzfager v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- First Nat. Bank of Arkansas City v. LeechCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Banks v. Chas. Kurz Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946