State v. Lawrence
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit Court, Perkins County; Ho-n. W. F. Eddy, Judge. Affirmed. (1) To point one of the opinion, Appellant cited: ’State v. Edney, 60 N. C. 463; Ewing v. United States, 240 Fed. 252; State v.Benzion, 79 la. 470; Jones v. Gordon, 82 Ga. 570, 9 S. E. 784; Smith v. Spencer, 63 Ga. 702; Dennard v. State, 2 Ga. 137; Park v. State, 4 Ga. 329; Adams v. Governor, 22 Ga. 417; State v. Bowman, 30 La.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Circuit Court, Perkins County; Ho-n. W. F. Eddy, Judge. Affirmed. (1) To point one of the opinion, Appellant cited: ’State v. Edney, 60 N. C. 463; Ewing v. United States, 240 Fed. 252; State v.Benzion, 79 la. 470; Jones v. Gordon, 82 Ga. 570, 9 S. E. 784; Smith v. Spencer, 63 Ga. 702; Dennard v. State, 2 Ga. 137; Park v. State, 4 Ga. 329; Adams v. Governor, 22 Ga. 417; State v. Bowman, 30 La. Ann. '628; Haney v. People (Colo.), 21 Pac. 39; State v. Brockhaus, 72 Conn. 117, 43 Atl. 850; Sauskelonis v. Herting (Conn.), 94 Atl. 368; State v. Brun, 6 S. D. 5.3-7; State v. Casey, 44 S.…
1Opinion of the CourtGates, J.
This is an action against the principal and sureties upon an instrument, in form a bail bond, running to the state. The trial court held that the sureties were not liable upon said *601instrument and entered judgment dismissing the action. Therefrom the state appeals.
[i] The principal, Lawrence, was arrested upon a criminal charge and bound over to the circuit court on January 27, 1921, by a justice of the peace of Perkins county, and his bail was fixed at $1,000. He remained in the custody of the sheriff until March 7, when said bail ‘bond was executed by the principal and two sureties, and an…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Rachel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Rachel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- People v. GrattonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- State v. LawrenceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923