Auflick v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The appellant, seeking post conviction relief under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 App., failed to allege that he was insolvent and unable to obtain counsel at the time he entered his plea. *768The motion, therefore, was legally insufficient. Savage v. State, Fla.App.1963, 156 So.2d 566. See also Dias v. State, Fla.App., 158 So.2d 766, wherein the court said:
“The right to counsel under the decision in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963), extends only to a person who is financially unable to employ counsel.”
Affirmed.
KANNER, Acting C. J., and ALLEN…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Savage v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- Dias v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
3Cited by4 opinions
- Duke v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Hoffman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Roberts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Auflick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1964