Legal Opinion

Goenner v. Glumicich

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1923No. Appeal, 54PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, J.,

Elizabeth Goenner, the plaintiff, leased to Glumicich, the defendant, certain real estate. The lease contained a clause as follows: “And the said lessee also covenants and agrees that he will in no way alter, remodel, or improve the aforesaid premises without first having obtained in writing the consent of the lessor.” There was a provision in the lease that on “failure of the said lessee to pay the installments of rent as due, keep all the covenants of the lease,” etc., judgment could be entered and writ of possession, with a clause of fi. fa., issued. During the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. NotopolosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Stevenson v. DersamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. James v. KurtzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burke to Use v. BryantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Lieberman v. Howard Johnson's Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API