Legal Opinion

Spence v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 13, 2015No. 298, 2014PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALIHURA, Justice:

Defendant-Below, Appellant, Christopher Spence (“Spence”), appeals from a Superior Court Order denying his Motion for a Mistrial. We AFFIRM the ultimate holding of the trial court based largely upon the well-reasoned Order denying Spence’s Motion, but with three exceptions to the trial court’s underlying analysis. The exceptions relate, in part, to the State’s use of a PowerPoint presentation during its closing argument.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY 1

This case arises from a shooting that occurred during an event at a party venue located at 1232 King Street in Wilmington,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Wainwright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of GlasmannWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  5. Dyson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. Fannon, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Athens County2018
  2. Morales v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
  3. Booker v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
  4. Crump v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
  5. Escalera v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API