Legal Opinion
The Newport
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 3, 1925No. 4527PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
7 F.2d 452 (1925)
THE NEWPORT.
G. AMSINCK & CO., Inc.,
v.
PACIFIC MAIL S. S. CO.
No. 4527.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
August 3, 1925.
Thacher & Wright, of San Francisco, Cal. (Thomas A. Thacher and Harrison A. Jones, both of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for appellant.
Farnham P. Griffiths, Harold A. Black, and McCutchen, Olney, Mannon & Greene, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.
Before HUNT, RUDKIN, and McCAMANT, Circuit Judges.
McCAMANT, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).
The negligence of the third assistant engineer is admitted, and respondents' case is rested…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- The SouthwarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- The SilviaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- International Navigation Co. v. Farr & Bailey Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- The Carib PrinceSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- The GermanicSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- The Jl LuckenbachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Mississippi Shipping Co., Inc., Claimant-Appellant v. Zander and Company, Inc., Libellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- United States v. Central Gulf Steamship CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1972
- Aspen Pictures, Inc. v. Oceanic Steamship Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- California Victor Distributing Co. v. Luckenbach S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.