American Trucking Associations v. City of Los Angeles
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Dissent
N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge,
dissenting in parts III.B., III.C., IV.B., IV.C., and TV.E. of the majority opinion:
I must dissent from the majority opinion because: (1) the market participant exception to preemption does not apply. Dray-age services (not port services) form the relevant market, and the Port of Los Angeles (the “Port”) acts as a regulator of drayage services. (2) Even assuming the Port qualifies as a proprietor, the off-street parking provisions are preempted, because they affect parties unrelated to contractual obligations to the Port. (3) The placard provision is preempted and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- South-Central Timber Development, Inc. v. WunnickeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- White v. Massachusetts Council of Construction Employers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Johnson v. Rancho Santiago Community College DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Engine Manufacturers Ass'n v. South Coast Air Quality Management District, (SCAQMD)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Castle v. Hayes Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.