Legal Opinion · Dissent

American Trucking Associations v. City of Los Angeles

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 26, 2011No. 10-56465Published

1Dissent

N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge,

dissenting in parts III.B., III.C., IV.B., IV.C., and TV.E. of the majority opinion:

I must dissent from the majority opinion because: (1) the market participant exception to preemption does not apply. Dray-age services (not port services) form the relevant market, and the Port of Los Angeles (the “Port”) acts as a regulator of drayage services. (2) Even assuming the Port qualifies as a proprietor, the off-street parking provisions are preempted, because they affect parties unrelated to contractual obligations to the Port. (3) The placard provision is preempted and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. South-Central Timber Development, Inc. v. WunnickeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. White v. Massachusetts Council of Construction Employers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Johnson v. Rancho Santiago Community College DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Engine Manufacturers Ass'n v. South Coast Air Quality Management District, (SCAQMD)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Castle v. Hayes Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API