Legal Opinion

In Re Federal Election Campaign Act Litigation

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 15, 1979No. M.D.L. Docket 372. Misc. 79-0136 (Civil Action 78-2097, 78-2193)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff and defendant have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. In addition, the defendant has moved for an amendment to this Court’s Order of April 17, 1979, 468 F.Supp. 1235 (D.D.C.1979), which would permit an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). Because there are no material facts in dispute, an award of summary judgment is proper and here, in light of the patent deficiencies in plaintiff’s complaints to the Federal Election Commission (“FEC” or “The Commission”), judgment must be awarded to the defendant. Of course, a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Walther v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1979

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Richard J. Orloski v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  2. Democratic Party of United States v. National Conservative Political Action CommitteeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. In Re Federal Election Campaign Act LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1979
  4. Federal Election Commission v. California Medical Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1980
  5. Common Cause v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API