Legal Opinion
F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Emery
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 28, 1930No. Nos. 5518, 5519PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HICKS, Circuit Judge.
Separate suits by appellee, Emery, against appellants, Woolworth Company and Kresge Company, for infringement of reissued letters patent No. 15,641, for “artificial fruit and method of producing same.” The cases were heard together. Claims 6, 8, 11, . and 13, all “article” claims, are in issue. The patent was before this court in Emery v. George H. Bowman Co., 11 F.(2d) 525, 526, and these claims were upheld. Judge Moorman there epitomized the claims as follows:
“Each of them provides for the same general structure consisting of: (1) A hollow easting of waxlike material;…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Twentieth Century Machinery Co. v. Loew Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
- Collins v. Hupp Motor Car CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
- Emery v. George H. Bowman Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
- Detroit Ry. & Harbor Terminals v. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
3Cited by1 opinion
- Emery v. J. G. McCrory Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1933